Teaching Resources

The articles and other resources listed below give useful information about designing and teaching effective presentations on the responsible conduct of research and scholarship. Topics include how to make effective use of case studies, how to integrate ethics education within the research setting and experience, and how to foster critical thinking and problem-solving about issues of research and scholarly integrity. Items available online here can be downloaded and copied into a CTools course site.

• Alexander, M, Williams, WR, 2004. A Guidebook for Teaching Selected Responsible Conduct of Research Topics to a Culturally Diverse Trainee Group. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
• Anderson, MS, 2007. “Collective Openness and Other Recommendations for the Promotion of Research Integrity.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 13, n. 4, 387-394.
• Anestidou, L, Heitman, E, 2002. “Responsible Conduct of Research Courses: The Responsible Conduct of Animal Research.” Investigating Research Integrity. Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Integrity, DHHS, 231-235.
• Bebeau, MJ, Bordern, SL, Muskavitch, KMT, et al, 1995. Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment. Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions.
• Bird, SJ, Sieber, JE, 2005. “Teaching Ethics in Science and Engineering: Effective Online Education.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 11, n. 3, 323-328.
• Bird, SJ, 2004. “Integrating Ethics Education at All Levels: Ethics as a Core Competency.” In Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering. National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 125-131.
• Burke, W, Fryer-Edwards, K, 2004. Biomedical Research Integrity Cases: Teaching Cases and Background Materials. University of Washington.
• Coppola, BP, 2000. “Targeting Entry Points for Ethics in Chemistry Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Chemical Education, v. 77, n. 11, 1506-1511
• Council of Graduate Schools, 2009. Best Practices in Graduate Education for the Responsible Conduct of Research. Washington, DC
• Davidson, EW, Cate, HE, Lewis, CM, et al, 2002. “Data Manipulation in the Undergraduate Laboratory: What are We Teaching?” Investigating Research Integrity. Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Integrity, 27-34
• “Ethics Education and Scientific And Engineering Research: What’s Been Learned? What Should Be Done?” Summary of a Workshop at the National Academies Keck Center, August 25-26, 2008. National Academies of Engineering of the National Academies.
• Fischer, BA, Zigmond, MJ, 2001. “Promoting Responsible Conduct in Research throught “Survival Skills” Workshops: Some Mentoring is Best Done in a Crowd.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 7, 563-587.
• Harris, CE, 2004. “Methodologies for Case Studies in Engineering Ethics.” In Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering. National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 79-93.
• Heitman, E, 2002. “Using Cases in the Study of Ethics.” In Bulger, RE, Heitman, E, Reisder, SJ, eds. The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological and Health Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 349-363.
• Kalichman, MW, 2005. “Surveys as a Tool for Training in Scientific Integrity.” Macrina, FL, Scientific Integrity: Text and Cases in Responsible Conduct of Research, 3rd edition. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 297-320.
• Kalichman, MW, 2007. “Responding to Challenges in Educating for the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Academic Medicine, v. 82, n. 9, 870-875.
• Kligyte, V, Marcy, RT, Waples, EP et al, 2008. “Application of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training in the Physical Sciences and Engineering.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v, 14, n. 2, 251-278.
• Mumford, MD, Connelly, S, Brown, RP, et al, 2008. “A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Effectiveness.” Ethics Behavior, v. 18, n. 4, 315-319.
• Pimple, KD, 2002. “Six Domains of Research Ethics. A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 8, 191-205
• Pimple, KD, 2002. “Using Short Writing Assignments in Teaching Research Ethics.” The Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics of American Institutions.
• Pimple, KD, 2002. “Using Small Group Assignments in Teaching Research Ethics.” The Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics of American Institutions.
• Pimple, KD, 2007. “Using Case Studies in Teaching Research Ethics.” The Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics of American Institutions.
• Pimple, KD, 2008. “Providing Professional Training in Research Ethics.” The Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics of American Institutions.
• Pimple, KD, 2008. “Assessing Student Learning in the Responsible Conduct of Research.” The Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics of American Institutions.
• Plemmons, DK, Brody, SA, Kalichman, MW, 2006. “Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Education in the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 12, n. 3, 571-582.
• Plemmons, DK, Kalichman, MW, 2007. “Reported Goals for Knowledge to be Learned in Responsible Conduct of Research Courses.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, v. 2, n. 2, 57-66.
• Reybold, LE, 2002. “Constructing a Personal Model of Research: Academic Culture and the Development of Professional Identity in the Professoriate.” Investigating Research Integrity. Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Integrity, DHHS, 41-47.
• Smith, K, Wueste, D, Frugoli, J, 2007. “Using “Ethics Labs” to Set a Framework for Ethical Discussion in an Undergraduate Science Course.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, v. 35, n. 5, 332-336.
• Steneck, NH, 2002. “Assessing the Integrity of Publicly Funded Research.” Investigating Research Integrity. Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Integrity, DHHS, 1-16.
• Steneck, NH, 2006. “Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 12, 53-74.
• Steneck, NH, Bulger, RE, 2007. “The History, Purpose, and Future of Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Academic Medicine, v. 82, n. 9, 829-834.
• Swazey, JP, Bird, SJ, 1997. “Teaching and Learning Research Ethics.” Elliott, D and Stern JE, eds. Research Ethics: A Reader. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England for the Institute for the Study of Applied and Professional Ethics at Dartmouth College, 1-19.
• Whitbeck, C, 2001. “Group Mentoring to Foster the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 7, 541-558.
• Wright, DE, Titus, SL, Cornelison, JB, 2008. “Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closes ORI Cases.” Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 14, n 3, 323-336.